Obama in Tokyo Walking the Pivot talk
Ninad D Sheth
The
US President, Barrack Obama starts his Asia tour with a visit to Japan, its most
important partner in Asia.
This
is a visit of great consequence visit.
President
Obama and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe dined
at the famed Sukiyabashi Jir restaurant, renowned as the shrine
of sushi. The menu s equally delicate some
of it raw.
The
main course the US security guarantee to Japan, the second is the Goliath trade
agreement, the trans - pacific partnership.
There
is great nervousness in Tokyo on American commitment to Japan’s security. Japan
needs reassurance.
The
visit comes in the wake of Japan’s simmering and dangerous dispute over the
islands known
as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China. While largely uninhabited they are claimed
by both countries.
China has been
unusually aggressive in its diplomatic posture and maritime activity concerning
these islands. It has based its diplomacy on the assumption that America may
not have the stomach for a fight so far away from home.
China is in for a very
rude surprise.
Obama’s interview to Japan’s largest newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun, Indicates that the American president is serious about the assurance. This is evident in the language he used in describing The Senkaku islands as being administered by Japan and in opposing any unilateral attempts to undermine Japan’s administration of these islands.
Article 5 of the U.S.-Japan Mutual Security treaty calls for the US to come to Japan’s aid in the event of war. It is a treaty that has held the peace in Asia for 60 odd years. It is also an alliance which has been influential in Japan not opting for nuclear weapons. Significantly, just before the trip Japan agreed to return 300kg of plutonium enough to make fifty atomic bombs and well within the Japanese technical capability to do so.
Clearly the ball is in play. China has been told in
very specific terms that the security stakes have suddenly gone up. If the United states walks the talk it can
call China’s bluff. China has few ral options. For all the talk of asymmetric
warfare, and a new aircraft carrier, the plain fact is that in
the Japanese littoral, China is at a significant military
disadvantage. Let alone the US seventh fleet, even the Japanese navy is
a very powerful force. It will only get more fire power and with the expected introduction
of new aegis class ships during the Obama visit.
What is more complicating for China is that Obama is walking
the pivot talk. The US seventh fleet is
set to base two more theater missile defense system destroyers in Japan. Suddenly China has a string of pearls around
it much like it fancies garlanding India with. From a US marines base in Perth
to robust naval engagement with Singapore and Japan added to a new thrust in
Taiwan the military massage to China is simple and clear.
This trip by the US President is to match American economic
resurgence with its foreign policy promise. I expect the outlines of the trans –
pacific partnership to be announced during this visit.
The new aggressive American stance is on the back of two imperative
economic factors. According to the council on foreign relations, a noted US
think tank, the housing recovery in price terms is only five percent lower than
when the recovery began in late 2009. Similarly, capacity in manufacturing,
mining, and electric and gas utilities is up 2 percent from 2008 and gaining
momentum. In the energy sector the US is will likely overtake Saudi Arabia and
Russia as the world’s top oil producer. Although the cost of producing that oil
is far more per barrel then in say Saudi Arabia. Most important of all US is tightening
its belt and printing a lot of money without leading to statistically significant
increase in inflation and yet propelling growth. When you factor in the final
push up that the U.S. government’s deficit will likely fall to $492 billion
this year, it is one big economic miracle.
Obama canceled his Japan trip twice. This time he speaks
from a position of strength. This is a
trip - if not to contain China surely to caution it. One banks on the famous
Chinese pragmatism.
No comments:
Post a Comment